Thursday, September 09, 2010 7:51 AM  
     

The Sales Archaeologist:Sales and Business lessons from History.

Double Your Sales in 90 Days

My Training in Asia

Learn more about my work with sales teams in Asia.

April 2009 in Korea

August 2009 in Shanghai

 

ASK ME A QUESTION

 
Sales Archaeologist Blog  

the Sales Archaeologist

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Inbound Verses Outbound

Posted by Frank Belzer on Fri, Oct 23, 2009 @ 05:32 AM
Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

During the Battle of Britain a new innovation - Radar was given much of the credit as to how the smaller British air force held the luftwaffe at bay and eventually led to their defeat. Radar could tell them where they were coming from and at what speed and in what direction and how many and in some cases what type of aircraft.

This information enabled the RAF to take off with a clear destination in mind and by reaching the enemy sooner and often before they hit British soil they were able to shoot them down and return to base and await the next wave.

Radar helped - but the fighter planes still had to act on that information and take the ultimate risk and destroy the enemy.

Lately there has been a lot of talk about the "power" of inbound marketing and the importance of being extremely active with social media and this idea that cold calling is dead etc....and to be quite honest I have been a little irritated by these comments. I still adhere to the fact that most of the people making them are not able to sell themselves and have for years been looking for an excuse and a easier approach and now they have it!

Here is the point - Radar is like these tools. The latest thing, great indicators of who, what, when and how many BUT you still need the sales person that is able to take that information and accomplish the ultimate goal. Furthermore the Battle of Britain was helped by Radar but there would have been no chance of winning without the RAF! I hate to break it to the evangelists of the Inbound Marketing craze but I just don't see it. I also don't understand the constant disdain for those of us that use the "old" method quite successfully.

Case in point - Our upcoming executive luncheon (I blogged about it in the last post) I have used the old method - calling suitable prospects and talking to them and persuading them to attend. As a result I have been able to register almost 70 executives myself! That said how are the proponents of inbound marketing doing. Well let's just say that a Spitfire fighter verses a stationary Radar Station will win every time - yes I am kicking their butts!!!

COMMENTS

Frank, it's my fault! I am the second most common weakness found in salespeople. That's why with or without Inbound Marketing, salespeople complain about their crappy conversion to revenue, but it sound like "stupid prospects" or "buyers are liars".

posted @ Friday, October 23, 2009 6:20 AM by Mr. Non-Supportive Buy Cycle


It's true. The inbound marketing folks who are sponsoring this event have tweeted and posted to their blogs multiple times and have mustered less than 24 registrations while their salespeople haven't been able to persuade even a dozen people to attend - as their guests! - a kick-ass luncheon with two great speakers at a great venue. Meanwhile, Frank is just picking up the phone and calling people, getting through to presidents and VP's of sales, and converting them to attendees. 
 
You tell us what's dead!

posted @ Friday, October 23, 2009 7:09 AM by Dave Kurlan


To be fair, I think that there has to be an equal balance of inbound AND outbound marketing and sales efforts. I don't think in this day and age you can rely on just one method.

posted @ Friday, October 23, 2009 9:53 AM by Cathy Boudreau


Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

 

Subscribe by Email

Your email:
 
© 2010 Dave Kurlan - Understanding the Sales Force Terms of Use Privacy Policy