Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:37 AM  
     

Dave Kurlan on Understanding the Sales Force

CONTACT DAVE

 

SUBSCRIBE BY EMAIL

Your email:
 

SUBSCRIBE ON YOUR KINDLE

 

Search 700+ Kurlan Articles

 

RECENT POSTS

 

Kurlan Article Series

 

Most Popular

 

AWARDS

Top sales blogs award









The Best Sales Blogs in the World widget
Top 10 Sales Articles winner of Month widget
Alltop, all the top stories

Cool Book of the Day
 

 

 
Dave Kurlan's Blog  

Understanding the Sales Force

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Ultimate Comparison of Top Salespeople versus Salespeople That Fail

  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook | Buzz This  Google Buzz | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Dave Kurlan is a top-rated speaker, best-selling author, sales thought leader and highly regarded sales development expert.

If you've been following this Blog you know I sometimes refer to the elite 5% of salespeople, the next 20% and the bottom 74%.  After reading Super Freakonomics I was moved to take a new look at our data on the more than 400,000 salespeople we have assessed.  Behavioral scientists would look at our data on the top 5% and report on some common findings.  It might look like this: 

Top Salespeople have the following common characteristics:

They enjoy selling

They prospect consistently

They have a strong Outlook

Of course, there are many more but, the problem I always have with these studies is that they don't look at the characteristics of the salespeople who are failing.  Would you be surprised to know that the bottom 5% have these characteristics too?  Well, they do.  A more interesting comparison would be to look at the characteristics where the biggest differences are:

 Top 5%

 Trait

 Bottom 5%

 99.5%

 Trainable and Coachable

 0%

 100%

 Strong Desire for Sales Success

 0%

 95%

 Strong Commitment to Sales Success

 33%

 94%

 No Excuse Making

 20%

 78%

 Don't Need Approval from Prospects

 6%

 59%

 Don't Get Emotional

 10%

 98%

 Comfortable Talking Personal Finances

 2%

 79%

 Supportive Sales Beliefs

 0%

 76%

 Supportive Buying Habits

 8%

 74 pts.

 Average Severity of 5 Biggest Weaknesses

 251 pts.

 95%

 Rejection Proof

 18%

 100%

 Have Personal Written Goals

 16%

 95%

 High Money Tolerance (choking point)

 35%

 88%

 Make Decisions to Buy without Thinking it Over

 18%

 77%

 % of the Attributes of a Hunter

 31%

 45%

 % of the Attributes of a Closer

 8%

 59%

 % of the Attributes of a Qualifier

 11%

Wow, right?

And you wonder why I make such a big deal out of the difference between personality and behavioral styles assessments as compared with our assessments.  You don't have to look much further than the impact of getting Desire wrong.  If the personality and behavioral styles assessments can't measure Desire for Success in Sales, they can't report on it.  They measure Drive (all the successful people in your company have it but they don't all belong in sales) but market it as a sales finding.

There is a huge difference between the top and bottom performers but any individual finding is meaningless unless it is considered as part of the whole, and in the context of what the salesperson will be selling, who they'll be selling it to, the anticipated resistance, and the expected competition.

Despite the huge gap between the top and bottom groups, even the top group of salespeople falter in these areas:

only 50% are Motivated to earn more money - but that's because most of them have made so much already!

only 29% of them have a sales process they follow - that just reinforces what I've been writing about lately.  The lack of formal sales processes in companies is just astounding!

as you saw from the data above, they only average 45% of the attributes of the closer skill set.  That just places more importance on the earlier stages of the sales process and reinforces what I so often say.  If you slow down between 1st and 2nd base, the sales process will accelerate and closing will take care of itself.

only 34% of them are effective getting high enough in the company.  They aren't a whole lot better in this area than their weak counterparts who get to top decision makers a whopping 20% of the time.

only 43% of them are consistently uncovering the real budget so you know they are wasting some time as a result of that.

here's a shocker - despite the fact that 90% of them prospect consistently (although we don't define what consistent is), only 55% of them have the desire to do it, so they force themselves.  The bottom 5%?  10% more, or 65% have the desire to prospect consistently, but 8% fewer, or 82% actually prospect consistently.

Now that you've seen the data comparing the top and bottom salespeople in the world, what jumps out at you?

(c) Copyright 2009 Dave Kurlan


Posted by Dave Kurlan on Mon, Dec 07, 2009 @ 08:29 PM

COMMENTS

Great data Dave, thank you for pulling this together. What jumps out at me is the degree to which even "top sales people" can still learn and improve. When you look at the percentage of attributes for a hunter, closer and qualifier even the top performers leave plenty of room for improvement. I believe this caused in part by the lack of a formal sales process (as you point out, only 29% have one). Everyone, even top performing sales people, can benefit from defining and following a sales process they can use consistently.

posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 at 11:52 AM by Mike Carroll


@Mike, great observation - that's probably why top salespeople who are trained and coached get so much better. And remember, a 15% improvement on a $2 million producer nets $250K per year. A 50% improvement on a $500K producer nets the same amount but it takes twice as long....

posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 at 11:56 AM by Dave Kurlan


A question on your analysis: what data do you use to determine the performance rankings of the 400,000 people (i.e., how do you know who is in the top 5% or any other cohort)?

posted on Wednesday, December 09, 2009 at 8:02 AM by mt


@MT great question! 
 
these aren't performance rankings. These are assessment results. They correlate to performance but only if you measure performance correctly. For instance, the salesperson in your company who is always at the top of the leader board might not be your best salesperson, but might be benefiting from managing the best, biggest accounts. As a matter of fact, this salesperson may have had nothing to do with bring these accounts on board and the accounts may have even shrunk in revenue. But as long as his/her dollars are bigger than everyone else's, he/she is #1. That's an example of results, but not performance. You may have another salesperson who is not on the radar as far as results, but is doing everything right, every day. This unheralded salesperson could be your top performer. 
 
So our assessment data tends to be a more accurate indicator of performance but not results since results are not always a measure of performance. 
 
Does that help?

posted on Wednesday, December 09, 2009 at 9:24 AM by Dave Kurlan


Your comparison has been invaluable to us. We took your data and applied it to the evaluations of everyone in our team and looked at the deficiencies that we had and how they were impacting us. We have now developed a training plan to attack those areas.  
 
 
 
We took this template to a client yesterday and applied it to his team and had him commit to a development plan once again aimed the key areas you identified. 
 
 
 
This is a great tool for us and one that will add value to our clients. Many thanks.

posted on Wednesday, December 09, 2009 at 5:33 PM by Gary Delbridge


@Gary - glad it was so helpful to you!

posted on Wednesday, December 09, 2009 at 8:02 PM by Dave Kurlan


Great data Dave! Another interesting point from the data was that 100% of the top 5% of Salespeople have written personal goals. Also, the top sales people have very high % points in the area of talking about money and money tolerance! It's interesting that 75% of the salespeople we work with when they first met us had a great difficulty talking or have a meaningful conversation around the money issue. Thanks! Graham

posted on Friday, February 12, 2010 at 2:09 PM by Graham


Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

 

ENTER TO WIN

Sales Force Makeover
 

HERE RIGHT NOW

 

FREE DOWNLOAD

 

BEST-SELLER

Baseline Selling 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Download to your Kindle

 

Radio Show

Meet the Sales Experts Radio Show

 

Sales Force Evaluation

 

FREE TOOLS

Free Sales Force Grader

Free Hiring Mistake Grader

Free Sales Achievement Grader

 

Dave Kurlan on TV

World Business Review

 

Books

 

[Click to edit the title]

This is the content. This is demonstration text. Click 'edit' above to create your own content.
 
© 2010 Dave Kurlan - Understanding the Sales Force Terms of Use Privacy Policy