Sales Best Practices - Not

Posted by Dave Kurlan on Sat, Mar 24, 2007 @ 07:03 AM

DePaul University recently published their study of Sales Organization Practices.  The survey is comprehensive and representative of more than 300 companies in many, varied industries. It can hardly be called and rightly isn't called "Best Practices"; just practices.  The survey shows that a very large percentage of the companies surveyed are not performing some important functions effectively. While 55% relied heavily on sales or marketing to generate revenue,  the problems sited in the survey include:

• lack of processes or effective practices for selecting and hiring salespeople;
• outdated compensation programs;
• tied heavily to clunky, under utilized in-house CRM;
• not providing enough selling skills training and development

Of most interest to me were the following findings:

• only 22% utilize talent identification
• most of that group uses personality-based criteria
• only 19% match talent to job

It amazes me that, with all the information available to companies, they still ignore hiring best practices, including the four areas in which OMG can help: optimization of the pool of candidates, candidate qualification, candidate selection and on-boarding and development.  It is very clear to all of us with expertise in sales force development, that companies have little clue, exercise little discipline, and have even less patience in these areas.

For example, we have found that companies in Financial Services who turnover upwards of 80-90% of their new salespeople, can't seem to understand that hiring 3 good people who will stay and produce is far more effective than hiring the first ten who agree to work on straight commission and then fail inside of 6 months.  I've done the math before but let's take another look.

Company A hires the first 10 people who agree to work for them and pay a total of  $150,000 ($30K annually) for 6 months to people who produce little, if anything, before turning over.

Company B hires 3 quality people who are paid a total of $150,000 ($100K annually) for 6 months and produce measurable revenue and stay on to become productive.

Why can't the companies in high turnover businesses see this?  The tools are available to accomplish this but since these concepts are not driven from the top down, managers, accustomed to being compensated by body count rather than average sales per rep, panic and revert back to old, ineffective methods.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the difference between company A and B.  And it doesn't take a rocket scientist to implement the process either.  But it does take more than a 60 day commitment to the new process.  When it's been broken for a decade it doesn't get fixed in a calendar quarter.

© Copyright 2007 Objective Management Group, Inc.

Topics: recruiting, assessment, Performance

Subscribe via Email

View All 1,850 Articles

About Dave

Best-Selling Author, Keynote Speaker and Sales Thought Leader,  Dave Kurlan's Understanding the Sales Force Blog has earned medals for the Top Sales & Marketing Blog award for nine consecutive years. This article earned a Bronze Medal for Top Sales Blog post in 2016, this one earned a Silver medal for 2017, and this article earned Silver for 2018. Read more about Dave

Email Dave

View Dave Kurlan's LinkedIn profile View Dave Kurlan's profile

Subscribe 

Receive new articles via email
Subscribe
 to the Blog on your Kindle 

 

 

Most Recent Articles

Awards  

Top 50 Sales & Marketing Blogs 2021

Sales & Marketing Hall of Fame Inductee

2020-07-20_14-45-52


 

2020-Bronze-BlogIndi

MVP2018_badge_winner_SPC

Top 50 most innovative sales bloggers

Top100SalesInfluencersOnTwitter

Hubspot Top 25 Blogs

 

2020_Top20_Web_Large_assessment_eval

2020-Gold-AssessTool

 

Free Tools

Sales Process Grader

Sales Candidate Assessment Free Trial

Sales Ghost Calculator

Sales Force Grader

Sales Hiring Mistake Calculator

FREE Recruiting Process Grader