Sales Leadership Training 

Gold Medal Top Sales & Marketing Blog 2011 Silver Medal Top Sales & Marketing Blog Post  2011 Finalist Top Sales & Marketing Thought Leader 2011 Finalist Top Sales & Marketing Thought Leader 2011

Your email:

Google

salesachievementgrader

          Baseline Selling 

Great Sites


topsalesworld
Sales Pro Central

Understanding the Sales Force

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Survival of the Fittest on the Sales Force

  
  
  

Dave Kurlan is a top-rated speaker, best-selling author, sales thought leader and highly regarded sales development expert.
When one salesperson complains that they lost a piece of business to another of your salespeople you have a problem on your hands.  One client says his salespeople refer to one particular salesperson as "the pirate" because they think she steals their prospects.  When territories are properly defined, this happens less often but even then the problem can creep up?  What's behind it?  Why does it happen?

The first thing you need to understand is that this only happens when four conditions exist:

Condition #1: Your salespeople are competitive.
Condition #2: One salesperson has already failed in his attempt to close the business
Condition #3: The salesperson who lost the business is struggling and could have really used the commission.
Condition #4: The salesperson who lost the business was not memorable and the prospect chose not to do business with him.  

The key condition though is #2.  If the first salesperson to call on the prospect had been successful, the situation can't take place! In the end it's the customer/client that decides who gets the business.  Even if salesperson #2 backs off, there's no guarantee that salesperson #1 gets the business because he wasn't memorable enough, expert enough, strong enough, likable enough, etc.

To a certain extent, this whole scenario plays out like Natural Selection, a sort of survival of the fittest.  You must understand the conditions in order to recognize that it's usually whining by the losing salesperson when, in fact, the first salesperson had control of the situation until he failed to close the business.

© Copyright 2007 Objective Management Group, Inc.


whitepaper-banner2

Posted by Dave Kurlan on Mon, Aug 13, 2007 @ 09:12 AM

COMMENTS

I've been on both ends of this. I remember losing when I worked in retail, but if I put my coach hat on, I hear myself asking myself, "So, why didn't you get money when the customer was in before?" and I never like the answer. When I've been on the "winning end", I've often found myself wondering why the "losing" salesperson didn't ask for my help. Maybe they just like to gamble...a chance to win 100% rather than a sure 50%? I always feel bad for them, but the prospect deserves to be helped if they really want to be.

posted on Tuesday, August 14, 2007 at 6:42 AM by Rick Roberge


I think your observations are correct! It seems to me, that the sum-total of your conclusion is that 1) there is a "losing" sales person and a "winning" sales person, ergo competition between team members, for the same piece of business is OK. 2) the end justifies the means.

My sense is your next blog needs to tell sales people and sales organizations what parameters can make this situation a win-win-win. For instance: territory rules (definitions as you mention); good sales behaviors and techniques (taught to all sales people); good systems and processes (to record and track prospecting and pipelines); and good sales management (to strengthen weak sales people and "control" strong ones).

Survival of the fittest, in more than one situation, has caused disharmonious existence and, even, extinction.

posted on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 at 8:49 AM by Rush Burkhardt


Comments have been closed for this article.