Sunday, March 14, 2010 7:53 AM  
     

Dave Kurlan on Understanding the Sales Force

SUBSCRIBE BY EMAIL

Your email:
 

SUBSCRIBE ON YOUR KINDLE

 

Search 600+ Kurlan Articles

Google
 

Kurlan Article Series

 

AWARDS

Top sales blogs award









The Best Sales Blogs in the World widget
Top 10 Sales Articles winner of Month widget
Alltop, all the top stories

Cool Book of the Day
 

 

Find Articles

Navigate By : 
[Article Index]
 
Dave Kurlan's Blog  

Understanding the Sales Force

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Sales Assessment - More Accurate Than Sales Management Thinks

 | Submit to Digg digg it | Submit to Reddit reddit | Add to delicious delicious | Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 

I have a single rule that I ask our sales development experts and their clients to follow:  When assessing sales candidates, if for whatever reason the assessment says, "Not Hirable", then the candidate must not be hired.  If the assessment says "Hirable", a candidate may still be undesirable for a handful of other reasons, but a "no is a no".   Many clients push back.  They talk about track record, the interview, how much their managers loved a candidate, etc.  And we push right back at them.  After all, our sales candidate assessments are the most accurate predictor of future sales success.  Period. 

I interviewed the sharpest candidate I have ever seen - in thirty years - in early October.  I had some coworkers interview him too.  We all came to the same conclusion - can't miss.  He had it all. Except for one little detail that I failed to share with anyone.  The assessment said, "not hirable".

Did I dare to violate my own rule?  Did I dare to override the most accurate assessment - the one I created and enhanced and fine tuned every day for the last sixteen years?  Did I dare to risk the consequences?  Our own statistics show that 75% of the candidates who were not recommended but were hired anyway, fail, usually within 6 weeks.  If I risked it, I would be as guilty as the sales development experts and their clents that use our assessments. 

I did it anyway.  He started on October 16 like a house on fire.  Today, right on schedule, six weeks into his new challenge, he resigned, discouraged, broken down by his inability to meet his own unrealistic expectations.  He failed.  I'm embarassed.  The only one who knew this would happen was my wife, the very talented marketing guru, Deborah Penta.  She met him once, early on, and predicted it.

There's a moral to this story, a lesson learned right in my own back yard.  If the OMG Express Screen - the Sales Candidate Assessment says, "Not Hirable", do not, under any circumstances, hire the candidate. 

© Copyright 2006 Objective Management Group, Inc.

Posted by Dave Kurlan on Fri, Dec 01, 2006 @ 01:59 PM

COMMENTS

You were lucky, Dave. Most of the times I've either gone against the results or had a client go against the results it takes a lot longer than 6 weeks for the end to come. Just today I had a client call who had hired against the recommendations of the screening results (they hadn't told me they did this). Nearly 1 year later they fired him and have to start over again. My client called saying he finally believes in the screening... but wouldn't this all be better if we didn't have to get burned first?

Good Selling!

posted on Friday, December 01, 2006 at 4:21 PM by Kevin Hallenbeck


Exactly Kevin! That's what this assessment is for - to prevent mistakes, to prevent management from using gut instinct when the empirical data shows that using gut instinct is inconsistent at best.

posted on Saturday, December 02, 2006 at 7:50 AM by Dave Kurlan


Thanks for being honest Dave. Buying AND hiring are emotional processes justified intellectually. Once you get that right "feeling", the temptation is irrestible. And for those naysayers out there: Yes, it's possible a non-hirable candidate might actually work out. But the odds are almost as bad as buying a scratch-and-play lottery ticket. A $10,000 or $50,000 lottery ticket...

Care to share any insights on what to say to an exec or manager that is making the hiring decision but not investing their own money? Especially if they are getting frustrated by the number of non-hirable recommendations?

posted on Monday, December 04, 2006 at 10:00 PM by Chip Doyle


Dave,

Thanks for the encouragement to read the post. My first thought is: Wow, Dave is human after all. You have done a great job keeping the bar high for all of us, distributors and clients alike.

We all have had to learn the lesson: A no is a no and a yes = move forward to the next step of the hiring process, but is not a guarentee.

It took me three times to learn it, but what the hell, I'm a slow southern boy.

Thanks for all the sacrafice you've made to make us better.

Good Selling,

Rocky

posted on Tuesday, December 05, 2006 at 3:12 PM by Rocky LaGroneq


Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Receive email when someone replies.
 

BEST-SELLER

 

Baseline Selling

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Download to your Kindle

 

Radio Show

 

FREE TOOLS

Free Sales Force Grader

Free Hiring Mistake Grader

Free Sales Achievement Grader

 

Dave Kurlan on TV

World Business Review

Dave Kurlan and OMG were featured on World Business Review, hosted by General Norman Schwarzkopf. Click above to view this 3 minute segment.

 

SALES SELECTION WHITE PAPER

 

Sales Force Evaluation

 
© 2010 Dave Kurlan - Understanding the Sales Force Terms of Use Privacy Policy