Pfizer Reducing Size of Sales Force by 20%

Posted by Dave Kurlan on Wed, Nov 29, 2006 @ 09:11 AM

How is this for confusing and hypocritical?  In the same year in which physicians voted Pfizer's sales force the most valuable among the major pharmaceutical companies, Pfizer announced that it is reducing the size of it's sales force by 20% as part of a $4 Billion dollar cost cutting measure.  Pfizer has apparently concluded that a sales force is not the best way to market its drugs to physicians.  Seth Godin would jump up and down upon hearing this. 

In my opinion, selling by the pharmaceutical industry has never been very effective.  With salespeople not required to actually close sales, their role has been more of ambassador, product expert and educator.  Measuring their effectiveness, as you can well imagine, is more difficult as well.

The real question is which 20% did Pfizer choose to jettison?  Their least senior salespeople?  Their least liked?  Those with the least potential for growth?  Those who make the fewest doctor visits? Those with the lowest sales to pharmacies?

When a company reorganizes its sales force, it can choose from various criteria to make its decisions.  Invariably, companies use subjective rather than objective reasoning and often make bad decisions.  When our sales force evaluation is used for this purpose it sheds light on the reasons why people perform the way they do, how closely they really fit in comparison to the company's strategic requirements, whether they can execute the company's strategies, sales management's impact on their performance, and a prediction of how they will perform in the future with proper development.  These findings cause companies to look at their sales organizations from a totally different perspective, one that's much more objective rather than subjective.

Did Pfizer evaluate their sales force prior to making their decision?  I don't know.  Did they use the right criteria?  I don't know that either.  Was it a good decision?  Probably.  Based on the data we have collected on 285,000 salespeople from 8,000 companies, it would be fair to say that 20% of the salespeople in most companies can be eliminated without a loss of revenue.  But the real key is in choosing the right 20% and most companies use the wrong information to make those decisions.

© Copyright 2006 Objective Management Group, Inc.

Topics: sales force evaluation, recruiting

Subscribe via Email

View All 1,800 Articles

About Dave

Best-Selling Author, Keynote Speaker and Sales Thought Leader.  Dave Kurlan's Understanding the Sales Force Blog has earned medals for the Top Sales & Marketing Blog award for eight consecutive years. This article earned a Bronze Medal for Top Sales Blog post in 2016, this one earned a Silver medal for 2017, and this article earned Silver for 2018. Read more about Dave.

Email Dave

View Dave Kurlan's LinkedIn profile View Dave Kurlan's profile

Subscribe 

Receive new articles via email
Subscribe
 to the Blog on your Kindle 

 

 

Most Recent Articles

Awards

Vendor Neutral Certified 100 SalesTech Vendor Objective Management Group

Sales & Marketing Hall of Fame Inductee

MVP2018_badge_winner_SPC

Leaading Sales Consultants 2018

Top Sales Awards 2018 - Individual Blog -  Silver

Top Sales Awards 2018 - Article/Post -  Silver


Top Sales Awards 2018 - Assessment Tool -  Gold

 2016 Top Sales & Marketing Individual Blog - Bronze

Top Sales & Marketing Awards 2015 -  Bronze - Thought Leader

2016 Top Sales & Marketing Podcast - Gold

2016 Top Sales & Marketing Webinar - Gold

Top Sales & Marketing Awards 2015 - Bronze - eBook/White Paper

Top 50 Sales & Marketing Blog 2019

Dave Kurlan Top 50 Sales Influencer 2015

Sales Pro Insider Blog

Top 50 most innovative sales bloggers

Top100Strategic

Top100SalesInfluencersOnTwitter



Hubspot Top 25 Blogs

 

Free Tools

Sales Process Grader

Sales Candidate Assessment Free Trial

Sales Ghost Calculator

Sales Force Grader

Sales Hiring Mistake Calculator

FREE Recruiting Process Grader