Sales Leadership Training 

Gold Medal Top Sales & Marketing Blog 2011 Silver Medal Top Sales & Marketing Blog Post  2011 Finalist Top Sales & Marketing Thought Leader 2011 Finalist Top Sales & Marketing Thought Leader 2011

Your email:

Google

salesachievementgrader

          Baseline Selling 

Great Sites


topsalesworld
Sales Pro Central

Understanding the Sales Force

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

NY Times Articles Hits Then Misses the Mark on Sales

  
  
  

Dave Kurlan is a top-rated speaker, best-selling author, sales thought leader and highly regarded sales development expert.

moneyNo doubt about it now. This has to be my lucky week.   on Tuesday I got to take on the Harvard Business Review,  it was Selling Power and Caliper on Wednesday, and today the New York Times!  I also learned that my Blog, Understanding the Sales Force, has been nominated for the 2010 Top Sales Blog Award.  Of course, my three negative commentaries from this week will assure that I won't win...

On to the New York Times.  They ran this article which gets two sides of the story right...

They wrote that you should let your salespeople earn all the money they can.  Perfect.  They said you shouldn't be concerned if your salespeople earn more than the owners, CEO, management team, etc.  OK!  Their only warning is that you don't tell your spouse...

As always, there is a third side to this story.  The previous compensation strategy works, only if you have very money motivated and very self motivated salespeople.  But only the top 6% fit that description.  Yes, there are many self motivated salespeople and money motivated salespeople  but only the top 6% have both of those attributes and consistently remain that way!  Of course Objective Management Group has the data to back that up!

The problem with the rest of the sales population is that they become complacent, and stop motivating themselves to sell, sell, sell.

You shouldn't limit the income your salespeople can earn although many companies cap their sales compensation programs at salary plus up to x% of salary in commissions.  It is more important that you know who you have working for you. Yesterday I spoke with a couple of executives who it seemed were paying their ineffective (selection problem) salespeople NOT to sell.  High base, probably more than these salespeople required to live on, and their salespeople weren't leaving their houses! If you don't have extremely money and self motivated salespeople on your team, then what combination of salary and commission will keep them motivated enough to continue selling?  In that case, less is more.

Compensation is tricky and one size never fits all.



whitepaper-banner2

Posted by Dave Kurlan on Thu, Nov 18, 2010 @ 04:43 AM

COMMENTS

Dave 
 
Dave I agree with your point but I think the Times missed the mark on a whole other front. I say not only tell your wife. Brag about how much you are paying the top salesperson because that person is making you a lot on money in a whole different way. He or she is bulding the value of your company. The Philadelphia Eagles Situation illustrates my point. About 14 years ago Jeff Lurie bought the football team for about $200 million by using all of his own and his mother's money and borrowing the rest. He had no cash left and for a few years couldn't sign free agents because they had no money for the signing bonus. A couple of years into his tenure they signed Donaovan McNabb as a rookie quarterback and a couple of years later they signed him to a $112 million contract which is just now expiring. McNabb made made ten times what Lurie made in salary. In fact during the first few years as owner there were probably 50 players on the team making more salary than the owner. McNabb and his teammates "sold" a lot tickets over the years by winning about 70% of their games. The team is now worth over $1 billion. Now, McNabb and his teammates were not on commission but they should have been. Because they increased the value of Lurie's team by about $800 million. or about $70 million to $80 million per year.  
 
the moral of the story is hire the right salespeople who are motivated and have the right skills (your top 6%) and pay them what it takes to keep them motivated. You will be rewarded in the end as the value of your company skyrockets.

posted on Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 6:12 AM by Dan Caramanico


What if meaning and purpose were added to the sale compensation plan. Once the other 94% of salespeople have earned enough money to make them happy they need further motivation outside themselves. If money isn't enough of a motivator and the carrot and stick isn't working then how about a greater purpose beyond themselves?  
 
For example how about a percentage of each sale they bring in goes to help a charity of THEIR choice. Better yet at the end of the year the charity recognizes the salesperson for the impact they made in the hungry children's lives or whatever benefit they chose. 
 
As Dan Pink puts it "we have the means we don't have the meaning" (purpose).

posted on Friday, November 19, 2010 at 2:05 PM by Paul


@Dan - great comments - nothing like increasing the value of the company! 
 
@Paul - it all comes down to personal meaning!

posted on Monday, December 06, 2010 at 7:58 PM by Dave Kurlan


Comments have been closed for this article.