About Dave

Dave Kurlan's Blog has earned a medal for the Top Sales & Marketing Blog award three years running and this year this article earned Gold. Read more about Dave.

Subscribe to the Blog

Your email:

Subscribe on Kindle 
Email me  


 Top 30 on Kindle
Top 100 on Amazon 

Top Sales World - Summer Reading 2014

Inbound 2014


Scroll for Awards

2013 Bronze Medal Top Sales & Marketing Blog2013 Gold Medal Top Sales & Marketing Article2013 Finalist Medal Top Sales & Marketing Thought Leader2013 Gold Medal Top Sales & Marketing Assessment Tool

Scroll for Free Tools

Sales Process Grader

Sales Candidate Assessment Free Trial

Sales Ghost Calculator

Sales Force Grader

Sales Hiring Mistake Calculator


FREE Recruiting Process Grader

Other Great Sites

top sales world  Evan Elite Promotion New  alltop

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

A Behavioral Styles Assessment vs. OMG's Express Screen


Dave Kurlan is a top-rated keynote speaker, best-selling author, sales thought leader and expert on all things sales and selling.

One end user assessed only 6 of their people. They cherry picked - their 3 best and 3 worst. They wanted to internally validate the results against some existing people that they knew. They also assessed those six using a popular behavioral styles test which is not sales specific. They said that the behavioral styles test pegged these people perfectly. But in this case, 'pegged' means the assessments described the people; their tendencies and behaviors, how they were perceived as people, but not how they would perform in the field or whether they should have been hired.

The results of our assessment were different. The three worst were identified as people they shouldn't have hired. No question. Terribly weak and unqualified for a sales position at this company. Of the three stronger people, all three appeared much stronger on their assessments than the three weakest however, only one would have been hirable.

The client wondered if since the six were pegged accurately (as people) that the other assessment could be more helpful. However, they would have to find a way to translate their assessment as people to sales performance AND draw a conclusion. In addition, the other assessment would help them find candidates that were similar to these people - NOT similar in the way they approach sales!

Our assessment would identify candidates who were all as good as the strongest of those three - AND BETTER. The client would not have to draw a conclusion because our sales specific assessment makes the recommendation for them. Ours also has a predictive validity of 95%. Statistics show that when a company hires a candidate who was not recommended there is a 75% chance that the candidate will fail. Those are strong odds. The odds are pretty strong in support of following a hirable recommendation as well. 95%.

Which would you rather rely on?

© Copyright  Dave Kurlan All Rights Reserved

Posted by Dave Kurlan on Wed, Jul 26, 2006 @ 10:55 PM


These comparisons of tests are great. Do you have any comparison specifically on Devine as we are running across them a lot in Cincinnati as they are based here.

posted on Thursday, September 14, 2006 at 11:03 AM by <a href='http://www.lynnmcinturf.com' rel='nofollow'>christine meyer</a>

I won't mention the names of the other assessments in this Blog Christine because I don't think it's very nice to make them look bad. The reality is that most of these other assessments are quite good, as long as they're used as originally intended, which was not to predict sales success.

posted on Thursday, September 14, 2006 at 11:03 AM by <a href='http://www.blogger.com/profile/8573008' rel='nofollow'>Dave Kurlan</a>

Post Comment
Website (optional)

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics