Sales Leadership Training 

Gold Medal Top Sales & Marketing Blog 2011 Silver Medal Top Sales & Marketing Blog Post  2011 Finalist Top Sales & Marketing Thought Leader 2011 Finalist Top Sales & Marketing Thought Leader 2011

Your email:

Google

salesachievementgrader

          Baseline Selling 

Great Sites


topsalesworld
Sales Pro Central

Understanding the Sales Force

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Sales Performance - Does it Correlate with First Impressions?

  
  
  

Dave Kurlan is a top-rated speaker, best-selling author, sales thought leader and highly regarded sales development expert.

Last week I interviewed 16 candidates for 4 positions for 3 clients.  The interviews took place either by phone, high definition video conference, in my office, or in our conference room.  We aren't recruiters but we do help clients with recruiting and selection when they lack the bandwidth to do it themselves or when their track record from doing it themselves isn't pretty.

Coincidentally, I also happened to be reading two chapters in Malcom Gladwell's book, What the Dog Saw and Other Adventures, on Talent and Interviews.  He wrote that people form opinions of others, including at interviews, in as little as the first 2 seconds, and everything that happens after that supports the opinion formed.  For example, if your first impression caused you to like a candidate, and later during the interview she pushed back, you might think, "Wow, she's bold!"  On the other hand, if your first impression caused you to dislike a candidate who later pushed back, you might think, "Wow, he's such a jerk!"

Hold that thought.

Let me talk about the first impressions and the follow up thoughts I had on 3 candidates.

I met candidate #1 in our reception area and my first impression was, "Oh boy, what awful hair!"  He was at least my age (55) and his eyebrows were very light brown, so the hair shouldn't have been jet black and it certainly shouldn't have been combed up (think 70's on a woman) so high.  I hadn't spoken with him in person yet and already I didn't like him for the position!  But I forced myself to recall the phone conversation I had with him the previous week where he scored off the charts.  Sure enough, he had a terrific demeanor, was clearly a superior salesperson and was a very likeable guy.  I was able to override my first impression.  BUT, how would my client, very particular about appearances, react to his bad hair and, even more importantly, how would their existing and potential customers react?  Would they be motivated to do what I had done and look beyond the hair?  Smart as I can be about such things, I don't leave thoughts like that to chance.  So I confronted him about his hair, learned that a college professor friend had advised him to color it for the interview, and he agreed to get it cut and let the black fade away.

I met candidate #2 an hour later and he was angry.  Real angry.  His car hit a pot hole just before pulling into the parking lot and cracked an axle - although he didn't know the actual diagnosis when he walked in the door.  And he was mad at me because he drove to the wrong office.  He was supposed to be interviewing with the client, not me. Fortunately, rare as it is, my client happened to be just 10 minutes down the road and offered to come to our office.  Guess how that interview went?  In this case the first 2 seconds could not be undone.

Candidate #3 was someone I interviewed by phone and liked for the position.  After I attempted to schedule the follow up interview with my client, he sent me two emails that scared the hell out of me.  They were nasty, aggressive, mean, accusitory, cuss-laden and immature.  They were bad enough so that I changed my mind and decided not to allow this candidate to meet my client.  I couldn't see that behavior coming from the phone interview but the assessment did say he would get emotionally involved, that he didn't have any need for approval, and that he didn't recover well from rejection. That combination is not usually problematic but when it's a lunatic all bets are off! The funny thing is that he was never rejected!  It turns out that I didn't receive one of the emails he sent so he assumed that I rejected him and BANG. 

Do we form those first impressions that Gladwell wrote about?  Yes, I would say we do.  Do they support the rest of what we see and hear from that point forward?  The three examples above demonstrate that it may not always be the case.  I would like to think that the Sales Leaders, CEO's, Presidents and Sales Development Experts I have trained to interview sales candidates would be able to remain objective and unemotional enough to modify the first impressions they get.  My experience tells me that most of the people who interview do in fact make and retain their first impressions, and that's why their track record is so hit or miss with the candidates they decide to hire.  On the job sales performance simply has no correlation with the good first impressions that sales candidates make in their job interviews.  And the bad first impressions?  In most cases we'll never know!

describe the image



whitepaper-banner2

Posted by Dave Kurlan on Mon, Feb 07, 2011 @ 05:00 AM

COMMENTS

v. good

posted on Monday, February 07, 2011 at 6:25 AM by amt


@Phil - When you asked "...affect your assessments of them" I'm not sure whether the "them" you referred to are the other 13 or the 3 I wrote about. I'll answer it both ways... 
 
I have a scoring system I use on my phone calls and another one I use for my interviews. So my impressions are only that - impressions - and impressions are a single data point. Most managers use their impressions as their primary hiring criteria! As for how the impressions affected other candidates, they don't. Comparisons of one candidate to another are on the score sheet, and impressions don't factor into the comparisons. 
 
In the end, there are many factors that are scored. They include, but aren't limited to: type of experience, background, assessment scores, phone scores, interview scores, likability, and interview performance. Impressions fall under the category of likability. 
 
Does that help?

posted on Monday, February 07, 2011 at 8:21 AM by Dave Kurlan


@Dan - Thank you - I had a feeling you would make the case for assessing first! 
 
The assessment increased the chance that the candidate would have an opportunity to have a short phone conversation with me but it's their score on the phone call that determines whether they get the interview. Once they are on the interview they are on their own - it's their opportunity to impress or depress, based on how they respond to my questions, challenges, push-back and general disinterested approach.

posted on Monday, February 07, 2011 at 8:40 AM by Dave Kurlan


Dave - Thanks for your reply. I apologize for my poor question. I'll try ask it better. At least the "comments" section of your web page let us carry on a conversation about this.  
 
You interviewed a total of 16 people for these 4 positions for 3 clients. You've told us about 3 of those 16 candidates. Those 3 candidates made negative first impressions with you.  
 
Your post focused on candidates who made negative first impressions on you. I'd like to ask about the first impressions of the other 13 candidates you interviewed.  
 
The other 13 (16 minus 3) candidates you interviewed apparently made positive or neutral first impressions with you. But I'm pretty sure some of those 13 made better first impressions with you than others did. There are various shades/levels of "positive" or "neutral"... or whatever terminology your scoring sheet uses.  
 
Based on your answer to my previous question, I now have two questions for you. 
 
1. Your scoring system treats your first impression of a candidate as a single data point. How well did that single data point for each of those 13 other candidates correlate with the rest of the items in your scoring sheet? For example, did those candidates who made the best first impression on you score better on your scoring sheets than the candidates who made a lower (but still positive or neutral) first impression?  
 
2. In your opinion and based on your many years of experience, do you think those candidates who made the best first impressions on you would benefit significantly from a "halo effect" if they had been interviewed by most employers without your interviewing expertise and your scoring sheet?  
 
First impressions can work both ways... either hurting an otherwise good candidate or making a candidate look much better than she/he actually is. I'm trying to get at the latter in this question.  
 

posted on Monday, February 07, 2011 at 8:48 AM by Phil Hamilton


@ Phil - thanks for taking a second shot at this! 
 
First impressions typically don't correlate to overall interview scores. In other words, seldom are candidates able to overcome bad first impressions, and seldom are they able to live up to their good first impressions. Most candidates who have good interviews made good first impressions; but most candidates who make good first impressions don't do all that well on their interviews. Confusing? 
 
Yes, most employers would fall in love with candidates who make a good first impression, providing the candidate has the background the employer is looking for. 
 
This is where the assessment plays such an important part in the process. By using the right assessment to filter out everyone that shouldn't be considered, you're left with a quality pool of candidates so that if an employer falls in love, at least they're falling in love with a better candidate.

posted on Monday, February 07, 2011 at 8:53 AM by Dave Kurlan


These are sales candidates.  
 
If your first impression was poor, what will the first impression of the future company prospect going to be? I suspect the same as yours.  
 
You’re interviewing; they are on their BEST behavior—it’s not going to get better in the future.  
 
First impressions are important--don't question your gut--it's pretty likely that someone else (THE PROSPECT) will think the same. 

posted on Wednesday, February 09, 2011 at 4:48 AM by Ted LeBow


Ted Lebow -  
 
Excellent comment. We could help some of these prospects learn to make much better first impressions with prospects. But you're right... they're already applying for a sales position. Hiring them instead of someone else would require an overwhelming reason.

posted on Wednesday, February 09, 2011 at 9:50 AM by Phil Hamilton


Comments have been closed for this article.