Sales Leadership Training 

Gold Medal Top Sales & Marketing Blog 2011 Silver Medal Top Sales & Marketing Blog Post  2011 Finalist Top Sales & Marketing Thought Leader 2011 Finalist Top Sales & Marketing Thought Leader 2011

Your email:

Google

salesachievementgrader

          Baseline Selling 

Great Sites


topsalesworld
Sales Pro Central

Understanding the Sales Force

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Sales Force Alignment with Market Strategies

  
  
  

Dave Kurlan is a top-rated speaker, best-selling author, sales thought leader and highly regarded sales development expert.

Most companies differentiate between inside and outside sales; domestic and international sales; products and services; equipment and consumables, etc.

But if you are into breaking down processes, approaches, market strategies and positioning, there is more to it than these obvious differentiators.

The first is Need and Want - Do your prospects initially think they need what you have?  Do they initially want what you have?  Be honest.  Let's make an example of a sales development company like mine.  As you read this, do you need our help?  Do you want our help?  Obviously, if you answered yes to both questions, you would have already called, emailed or completed a inquiry form.  If you answered no to either of those questions, there is resistance.  How much resistance must your salespeople overcome?  How equipped are they to overcome resistance?  The two mistakes companies make here are:

  1. salespeople, experienced overcoming resistance, when their prospects both need and want what they have - these salespeople come on too strong;
  2. salespeople, experienced selling only to prospects that need and want what they have are deployed in markets where there is strong resistance (can you say economy?) and they aren't comfortable and don't know how to overcome it.  This leads to frustration, discouragement and failure.

The second is Why versus Why Me?  If your company sells and leases copiers, you are clearly in a 'why me?' sales process.  The company will buy copiers, but it's a question of who will get their business.  The salesperson's job is to get the prospect to choose you.  If you're in my business, where sales development is not a line item, and in many companies, not even a planned expense, the challenge is to sell you on why you need our help, as opposed to why you should choose us versus a competitor.  These two sales approaches are very different and the two mistakes that companies make are:

  1. their salespeople use a 'why me' when they are in a 'why?';
  2. their salespeople use a'why me' when they could more easily differentiate and create urgency by moving to a 'why?'.

The third is to or through?   Are you able to sell directly to your customer/client or must you first sell to someone else?  Is it a company that will stock and resell your products, like a distributor, or is it more like an agent who must recommend your service to his clients? Like the two  differentiators above, companies make mistakes here too:

  1. mistakenly believe that the reseller/agent will effectively sell their prospects on the merits of your product/service.  Instead, salespeople should be part sales coach.
  2. don't understand that selling resellers is different from selling to end users because rather than being sold only on the value of the product/service, it is even more important for them to be sold on how reseller your product/service helps them grow their business, attract new customers/clients, increase their revenue/profit, improve their image, etc.

So now you have three more differentiators to consider.  How well aligned is your sales force with these strategies?

(c) Copyright 2009 Dave Kurlan

 



whitepaper-banner2

Posted by Dave Kurlan on Tue, Apr 28, 2009 @ 03:07 PM

COMMENTS

Very interesting take and i'm glad to see a sales force development leader talking about the link between sales and marketing. 
 
While uncovering this issue of market focus and positioning, this topic still begs the issue of how to align these two efforts.  
 
The author Luke Hohmann, and CEO of Enthiosys is doing some fascinating work in this space to help companies figure out their value exchange model. In fact, I believe if you use Innovation Games and collaborate with customers they and define the Why or why me. Since they(including distributors) define the why and why the likelihood of alignment is much greater. 
 
Good Stuff.

posted on Tuesday, April 28, 2009 at 8:27 PM by Teicko Huber


There it is again! A new, compelling and largely forgotten topic! The Differentiation of Sales Process. Most of us who've been in the sales force development business for more than two minutes, have encountered the "but our stuff is different" mantra. Guess what? Most of the time 'stuff' is different! The crux of the issue is more in defining 'stuff' than simply crowing about differences. As Dave so ably describes, 'stuff' falls into different categories. 1. need vs. want: how ambiguous can that be, for most selling entities. If I sell software for managing inventory, does my "prospect" want it or need it. There's little dispute that the prospect might 'need' it, but a real dispute about whether the prospect 'wants' it! By nature, he doesn't 'want' it! It costs money and effort and training and on-and-on. The SP attempting to "convince" a prospect that he 'wants' that software is doomed to failure...unless he is able to help the prospect uncover compelling reasons to acquire it, and associate those compelling reasons with the impact of the problems (usually monetary association). At the point where the need/want really becomes 'needs and wants', the next issue to face is the 'why me?' Most sales people aren't even thinking about "selling" at this point. They're thinking about "presenting, proposing and pricing", while they ought to be, as Dave suggests, still dealing witht the impact of the problem and the 'why'! And the "to or through" is almost always "through", even if the contact is the decision maker! Until the sales person makes contact with "what's at stake" for the prospect, selling isn't happening! Sounds like, whether its "want vs. need", "why vs. why me" or "to vs. through" it had better be strategically related. Oh, and while you're at it you need to find a way to be sure your SP can pull the trigger on this type of strategic selling model...maybe even test them?

posted on Thursday, April 30, 2009 at 10:52 AM by Rush Burkhardt


@Teicko - I agree that sales and marketing need to be much better aligned than they are. While the issues I addressed should be adopted by marketing, it's more crucial that they be adopted by sales. 
 
@Rush - as always, you added great additional comments to the discussion.

posted on Friday, May 01, 2009 at 4:42 PM by Dave Kurlan


In my consulting practice, I certainly see the issue of mis-alignment with the sales force and marketing.  
More often than not, I see executives that have their strategy and position entirely wrong. So, I've lined up the sales team only to find out the Sr. Management team was operating under a business model that was no longer viable. 
 
Any thoughts on how to manage this chick or egg syndrome? All too often, I find the executive team is too quick to blame the salesforce. 
 
Just a thought in regard to alignment. I greatly appreciate you raising these issues. 
 

posted on Saturday, May 02, 2009 at 8:18 PM by Teicko


Dave: 
 
 
 
You have identified three critically valuable but misunderstood differentiators “Need vs. Want”, “Why vs. Why Me” and “To vs. Through”. 
 
Many of my clients were puzzled when we began to identify successful sales people they needed to hire and presented these variables. These three areas were completely overlooked in previous sales job searches because the clients would either fall in love with the client or fall in love with the client’s history. Just by introducing these differentiators they began to understand why turnover or complacency was creating issues. Perhaps you could elaborate a bit more on each differentiator on subsequent blogs. 
 

posted on Sunday, May 03, 2009 at 2:32 PM by Ted Gulas


Comments have been closed for this article.